Addressing Street Vending Countywide

Street vendors along Compton Avenue from 60th Street to Slauson Avenue.

For years now, residents and business owners in the Florence-Firestone section of Los Angeles County have complained about street vending lining Compton Avenue from 60th Street to Slauson Avenue, where everything from ice cream to t-shirts to CD’s and DVDs or bicycles and infant car seats are available for sale.

While these sidewalk swap meets provide income for some, they are a constant nuisance for local residents who live in the area, a drain on tax revenues and a hardship for mom-and-pop businesses that are forced to compete with vendors that literally set up shop directly in front of their venue.  They are also a public health hazard –vendors sell food that often is improperly stored or prepared in unsanitary conditions.

To address this problem, which  over the years has become increasingly  entrenched,  the Board of Supervisors , acting on a motion brought by  Chairman Mark Ridley-Thomas , called for county departments, including the departments of Regional Planning, Public Health and the Sheriff’s Department, to coordinate with each other and  create an ordinance that would abate the problem.  The motion also called for the departments to seek ample input from businesses, vendors and residents, who would be affected by new rules.

“These street vending areas have long posed a problem for residents and local businesses,” said Chairman Ridley-Thomas. “We have heard their complaints and we need more substantive and effective measures to address their needs. I fully support  appropriate channels for employment for hardworking people,  but this must be done in a way that is safe, healthy and legal, and  that does not harm the quality of life for others.”

Residents complain that as early as Thursday night, customers for the street vendors park and sleep in their cars to reserve a spot for shopping Friday through Sunday.   Not only is the congestion a neighborhood nuisance, many brick-and-mortar shop owners have trouble  making ends meet, unable to compete with the lower prices offered right in front of their stores.

“The same people that came to the United States for the American Dream are also being affected; these small mom-and-pop shops are being affected,” said Efren Martinez, executive director of the Florence Firestone/Walnut Park Chamber of Commerce. “I have had business owners come in here crying because they can no longer pay their rent because they losing all business to these vendors.”

Antonio Moreno, owner of a mini-mart in the Florence-Firestone area, told the supervisors that he rarely turns a profit on weekends, due to the 400 vendors who typically line the street, selling the same merchandise that he and other store owners sell too.

“At this point I’m in danger of closing my business, because I don’t have any sales Saturday and Sunday,” Moreno said. “Please keep me in mind when you’re deciding what to do — there are all kinds of delinquencies going on in that area — we’re desperate.”

Also, community members have noted that many of the  unauthorized vendors are not from the area, but have come to Compton Avenue because the laws against unlicensed vending are more rigorously enforced in other cities.

“For two long we have turned the other way while these communities are taught to think that there’s one standard for them and another for affluent communities, where rules are obeyed and enforced,” said Chairman Ridley-Thomas. “What we seek here is balance. We seek an ordinance that promotes fairness and safety and public health.  For everyone.”

[h3_underlined]What should the county do about street vending?  Share your thoughts. [/h3_underlined]

Supervisors Call for Budget Breakdown of Sheriff’s Medical Services

With the goal of increasing accountability from the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department Medical Services Bureau, the Board of Supervisors Tuesday took the unprecedented step of requiring a detailed breakdown of the bureau’s budget and detailed enumeration of services it delivers to inmates.

Acting on a motion by Board of Supervisors Chairman Mark Ridley-Thomas, the board ordered the creation of a separate budget unit for the bureau in next year’s annual budget, insisting that its current method of accounting is insufficient.

“We need to know – taxpayers need to know — exactly what services are being provided by the Sheriff’s medical bureau; how the bureau is staffed with doctors and nurses relative to the number of patients treated and what services are being delivered at precisely what cost,” said Ridley-Thomas. “This is a question of both patient care and economic efficiency.”

The Sheriff’s medical services bureau screens approximately 144,000 inmates each year, and the Sheriff’s Department estimates that 60 percent of all inmates who enter the jails receive some medical services. Treatments include: primary care, general obstetrics, gynecology, specialty care, ophthalmology and dentistry. In addition to services provided by the Sheriff’s department, the departments of Health Services and Mental Health also treat inmates, with the cost for medical care totaling about $241 million annually, according to a review of the bureau by the Auditor-Controller.

This significant investment of taxpayer funds, however, is not carefully tracked. The Sheriff’s Department, could not provide the Auditor-Controller with detailed information about physician and nurse contacts with inmates or a detailed workload.

Serious lapses by the department in medical attention to inmates have resulted in millions of dollars of payouts from the county to inmates who received either poor treatment or none for serious conditions, incidents that, along with the Auditor-Controller’s report, have catalyzed the board to more rigorously scrutinize the bureau.

“The lack of workload data prevents the county from assessing the efficacy of the services being delivered to inmates and the appropriateness of the cost for these services—and that’s no way to run a department,” the Supervisor said.

Lawmakers Stand in Solidarity with Gun Violence Prevention Legislation

Hoping to get more weapons off the street in cities across the nation, lawmakers and law enforcement officials recently turned out to support new federal legislation that aims to fund more gun buyback programs.

The Firearm Safety and Buyback Grant Act, introduced by Congresswoman Linda Sánchez, would establish a grant program within the Department of Justice to help local and state governments and law enforcement agencies fund anti-violence, gun safety campaigns and firearm buyback programs.

“This new legislation is about gun safety,” said the Congresswoman.  “It’s about safely disposing of unwanted firearms.  It’s about preventing gun violence.”

Announced at a press conference at the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Headquarters in Monterey Park, the bill was co-sponsored by Rep. Janice Hahn and Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard who were also joined by Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors Chairman Mark Ridley-Thomas, Los Angeles County Sheriff Lee Baca and Montebello Police Chief Kevin McClure.

Chairman Ridley-Thomas, who recently co-sponsored a Gifts for Guns exchange in Compton with the sheriff, noted that gun buybacks may not be a perfect solution to reducing violence but that they are a step in the right direction.  At the exchange, two weapons per minute were turned in by the first hour. A total of nearly 400 weapons were collected and more than $38,000 worth of Target and Ralphs gift cards  were distributed .

“Reducing gun violence requires all hands on deck – it requires prevention, mental health intervention, education, better parenting – the list goes on and on,” said Chairman Ridley-Thomas. “In the final analysis – reducing gun violence will require us as a society to shift our normative thinking. We must reject the culture of violence that permeates our society.”

Chairman Ridley-Thomas announced that he would introduce a motion to the Board of Supervisors in support of the gun violence prevention legislation.

Gun violence is an issue that affects all Americans.    On an annual basis 20 percent of the 100,000 people who are shot each year from gun violence in the United States are children and teens. Three thousand of those same children die each year from gun violence.  According to the Children’s Defense Fund 5,740 children and teens died from gun violence in 2008 and 2009; a number that would fill more than 229 classrooms of 25 students each.

“This legislation is smart. It is what needs to happen in order to invite residents to participate in a non-violent campaign in order to reduce gun violence,” said Chairman Ridley-Thomas.  “We have a moral imperative in this nation to take seriously the issue of reducing violence and crime. I’m here to lend my heartfelt support for this important legislation and I trust it will find its way to the desk of the President to sign into law because it will make a fundamental difference.”


Demanding Accountability from our Public Officials

Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors Chairman Mark Ridley-Thomas has asked for an audit to determine if Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department officials violated the law by reportedly sending  hundreds of bulletproof vests to Cambodia through the city of Gardena.

A total of 173 used and unused vests worth a total of more than $8,000 were sent through Gardena to Cambodia nearly ten years ago inside Sheriff’s Department patrol cars.  The ballistic vests were apparently not declared to customs officials, as required by federal law, and circumvented the rigorous procedures normally taken by U.S. government agents to prevent the transfer of body armor to the wrong people.

Chairman Ridley-Thomas said he was concerned federal, state and local laws may have been violated in the exchange. He has called for the county’s auditor-controller to determine if any sheriff’s or Gardena officials committed any “fraudulent or illegal activity.” The audit is expected to be concluded by the end of March and the results will be sent to the U.S. Attorney and District Attorney for review.

“This case is troubling on a variety of levels,” said Chairman Ridley-Thomas. “We must find out how this occurred and why taxpayer funded equipment was sent to unknown entities in other countries. It is utterly important to have transparency and accountability when it comes to matters of public safety and trust of government officials.”

Board Seeks $1 Billion Owed to Superior Court System

The Board of Supervisors Tuesday took an important step toward securing more funding for county’s beleaguered Superior Court system, which faces cutbacks and closure due to state budget difficulties, by seeking new ways to collect an enormous backlog of court fees and fines.

The value of uncollected judgments issued by the Los Angeles Superior Court totals more than $1 billion, a sum representing a significant loss of revenue to the County of Los Angeles.

Acting on a motion by Board Chairman Mark Ridley-Thomas, the supervisors have instructed the auditor-controller’s office to conduct a comprehensive audit of the county’s existing court collections contract with an eye to maximizing the effort.

Each year, approximately 480,000 cases of uncollected court fines and fees, valued at $380 million, are referred to a contract collection agency whenever a fine or fee has not been paid, a court appearance date has been missed or restitution is not paid after a court appearance. On the average, one-quarter of these cases are settled judicially, and for those that are not, the collection agency attempts to obtain the delinquent amount for three years. Typically, up to 30% is collected and after three years, the remainder is referred to the state Franchise Tax Board for collection. The state has a 10% collection rate.

Given the significant volume and value of delinquent accounts, it is crucial that the county identify and understand how it can increase the efficacy of its collections efforts.

“We must make this effort,” said Supervisor Ridley-Thomas. Over the past several years, the Los Angeles Superior Court has had unprecedented reductions in its services and has laid off hundreds of employees, closed courtrooms and curtailed or eliminated crucial services to the public. This isn’t just a decline in service though, it’s a decline in justice.”

For the fiscal year beginning July 1, the Superior Court is projecting a shortfall of between $50 million to $80 million, which would result in further staff reductions, more courtroom closures and a reduction of services to the public.

“Collecting this money is only the first step toward shoring up the Superior Court system,” said the Supervisor. “But in this economic environment, we cannot afford to ignore $1 billion of potential revenue.”